An Australian court has upheld a fine against Elon Musk’s X after the platform admitted it failed to comply with child protection requirements.
The decision brings an end to a three-year legal dispute between the social media company and Australia’s online safety regulator. The case began after the regulator asked the platform to provide information about how it was tackling the spread of child exploitation material online.
The company did not respond properly to the request, which led to enforcement action and a financial penalty.
Court Confirms Fine Against X
Australia’s internet safety regulator first issued the fine in 2023. The penalty came after the platform failed to adequately answer a formal request for information about its child safety measures.
X had argued that it was not required to respond because the request was sent before Twitter merged with X Corp. The company claimed that Twitter was no longer a separate company after the merger.
However, the court did not accept that argument. X later admitted wrongdoing and has now been ordered to pay a fine of A$650,000.
Legal Costs Also Added to Penalty

Justice Michael Wheelahan increased the original fine from A$610,000 to A$650,000. He also ordered the company to pay A$100,000 toward the regulator’s legal costs.
The judge said a penalty close to the maximum amount was appropriate because X is a large corporation. He said the fine needed to act as a real deterrent and should not be treated as just another business expense.
The penalty must be paid within 45 days.
Regulator Says Transparency Is Essential
Australia’s online safety regulator has said technology companies must be open about how they protect users, especially children.
The regulator’s request asked the platform to explain how it was handling child sexual abuse material and what systems it had in place to reduce online exploitation.
The request was first issued in February 2023, when the platform was still operating under its previous name. The merger with X Corp took place a month later.
A previous court decision had already ruled that X was required to respond to the transparency notice. The latest ruling confirms the penalty agreed by both parties.
Australia Has Clashed With X Before
This is not the first time Australian authorities have been in conflict with X over online safety issues.
The platform has previously faced pressure in Australia over harmful content, children’s access to social media and demands to remove violent material.
Australia has also introduced strict rules around social media use for younger users, making online child protection a major focus for regulators.
Online Safety Commissioner Faced Abuse
Australia’s online safety commissioner has previously said she received serious threats after public criticism from Elon Musk.
She said she had received death threats and that her children’s personal details were exposed online after Musk criticised her in a post to his large following.
The situation highlighted the growing tension between governments trying to regulate online platforms and technology companies that argue about free speech, censorship and platform responsibility.
Child Protection Remains a Major Concern
The case shows how seriously Australia is treating child safety on digital platforms.
Regulators want social media companies to explain what they are doing to stop harmful material involving children from spreading online. They also expect major technology platforms to respond properly when official requests are made.
The fine against X sends a message that large platforms can face legal consequences if they fail to meet transparency and safety requirements.
Social Media Platforms Face Growing Scrutiny
Governments around the world are increasing pressure on social media companies to do more about harmful content.
Child exploitation material, violent videos, misinformation and AI-generated abuse have become major concerns for regulators.
Australia has taken one of the tougher approaches to online safety enforcement. The court’s decision shows that authorities are willing to pursue major technology companies when they believe safety laws have not been followed.
Legal Battle Comes to an End
With X agreeing to the penalty, the long-running legal case has now been resolved.
The company must pay the fine and legal costs within the deadline set by the court. For Australia’s online safety regulator, the ruling is an important step in holding major platforms accountable.
The case also sends a wider warning to social media companies that requests for transparency around child protection must be taken seriously.
